Some advice intercepted from a veteran |
![]() |
Recently,
a friend of mine found an e-mail from a music minister in a
pastor’s inbox and
was given permission to share it with me.
I will not give any names, details or circumstances,
but the main part
of the message was as follows:
I will leave the reader to draw your
own conclusions about this person’s attitude and spirituality. I will just make the
simple observation that
most of the time pastors think that they are the ones who get all the
criticism, and I am sure that they hear all this and more from some of
the
members who will go behind a music minister’s back to do
their gossiping. It
certainly doesn’t help matters when the
pastor joins in or adopts the attitude that all musicians are flakes
and
oddballs (I once actually heard a pastor ask his music team to openly
admit
that very thing).
Music is certainly an important
aspect of any church’s worship life; therefore throughout the
history of the
church much controversy has surrounded it.
For example, in the seventeenth century the interval
called a “tri-tone”
was nicknamed by the churches as the diabolos
en musica (the devil in music), and its use was strictly
forbidden in
sacred music. Eventually
when it finally
was allowed, the church demanded that it be resolved in a particular
manner,
and no other way was acceptable.
Every
time a new style or genre of music enters the culture, the church
generally
condemns it, only to accept it as normal only one or two generations
later.
The church has also demonstrated
great confusion about the purpose of music.
Some argue that its only true purpose is worship;
this usually results in
the rules and regulations from the church into just exactly how the
music is to
be played, thus showing the preferences of that group as to its style
and
idioms, even down to the lyrical nuances and tempos.
Others believe that music exists for
evangelism—that
it “draws the crowds and prepares their hearts for the
Word.” Still
others, usually musicians themselves,
will contend that music in the church has the same purpose as it does
outside
the church, which is free expression and artistry.
It is rare to find a mind large enough to
concede that all these are equally valid, as well as other purposes not
mentioned here.
Churches also vary as to the level
of importance to a service that they feel the music ministry has. Some churches place so
great a significance
on their music that they spend large amounts of money on sound
equipment,
acoustics, instruments and salaries for the musicians (one church in
Texas that
I know of pays every musician union scale for every service!) so that
extreme
pressure is put on the performers to give a professional sounding show
every
time, which no doubt could have been the case in the letter above. Other churches simply
refer to the music as
“the preliminaries” and hardly place any emphasis
on worship at all. A
healthy, balanced attitude is again rare. |